OBJECTIVE: To determine body image disturbance and relationship satisfaction between obese and non-obese ple consisted of 100 participants. Data was collected through purposive sampling technique from different gyms and nutrient-clinics of Johar Town, Faisal Town and Model Town of Lahore city. Educated females having minimum education level of intermediate belonging to upper and middle-class families were recruited. The shortened form of Body Shape Questionnaire and Relationship Assessment Scale were administered, in addition to collecting demographic information through a semi structure performa. Independent sample t-test and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used in the analysis of the data, using SPSS v.21.RESULTS: Most of obese and non-obese married women (n=) were in the age range of 25-35 years and 30-40 years respectively with mean age of 34 years for obese and 33 years for non-obese married women. Husband’s mean age for obese and non-obese was 39 years and 38 years respectively. Almost all the non-obese (n=) while most of the obese (n=) married women were having education level of 16 or more while almost all the non-obese (n=) were working women and most (n=) of the obese were house wives. Thirty-two () non-obese were having 2-6 years while (n=) obese married women were having 7-9 years of marriage duration. A significant relationship was shown at the level of body image disturbance (p<0.000) and marital satisfaction (p<0.000) between obese and non-obese married women.CONCLUSION: Obesity has significant impact on body image and relationship satisfaction in married women.
- Chi town
People are permitted and you may encouraged to blog post the things they’re doing on the web (elizabeth.grams., inside the organization repositories otherwise on their site) ahead of and you will when you look at the distribution processes, as you can bring about effective exchanges, including prior to and you may greater pass of penned really works.
World Fitness Organization. Being obese and heavy 2016. National Institute off All forms of diabetes and you will Digestion and you will Kidney Ailment. Heavy and you will carrying excess fat statistics [Internet] 2012. Burkhauser Rv, Cawley J. Past Body mass index: the worth of far more exact measures from fatness and you may obesity in public research browse. J Health Econ 2008;27(2):519-29. DOI: /j. Crowther Nj-new jersey, Norris SA. The modern waist circumference reduce section employed for the fresh analysis from metabolic syndrome inside sandwich-Saharan African females is not suitable. PLoS You to 2012;7(11):e48883. DOI: /record. Goswami S, Sachdeva S, Sachdeva Roentgen. Human anatomy photo fulfillment certainly girls college students. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21(2):168-72. DOI: -53. Ng Yards, Fleming T, Robinson Meters, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, ainsi que al. International, regional, and you can federal incidence off heavy and you will being obese in children and people through the 1980-2013: a systematic data to the Globally Weight away from Situation Research 2013.
The fresh new Lancet 2014 Can get 30;384(9945):766-81. DOI: /S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Jernigan Am, Tergas AI, Silk AJ, Fader An enthusiastic. Being obese management inside the gynecologic cancer tumors survivors: seller methods and you will attitudes. Have always been J Obstet Gynecol 20. Sallis JF, Owen Letter, Fische EB. Environmental varieties of wellness choices. Within the Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, publishers. Wellness Behavior and you can Wellness Degree: Idea, Look, and exercise. JOSSEY-Bass, good wiley imprint. John Wiley & Sons, Bay area, U . s .. Bandura A beneficial. A social intellectual theory out-of identity. During the Pervin L, John O, editors. Guide away from personality. Guilford E-books, Nyc, Usa. Sarwer DB, Lavery Meters, Spitzer JC. A look at the latest matchmaking between significant carrying excess fat, standard of living, and you will sexual means. Obes Surg 2012 Annual percentage rate;22(4):668-76. DOI: /sstep 1step one695-0step 12-0588-step one. Paeratakul S, Light MA, Williamson Weil, Ryan DH, Bray GA.
Gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic reputation, and you can Bmi about care about?perception of fat. Obes Res 20. McNulty JK, Neff La, Karney BR. Beyond 1st appeal: bodily appeal in the newlywed Feb;22(1):135-43. DOI: -. Arcelus J, Yates Good, Whiteley R. Intimate dating, scientific and you will sandwich-clinical restaurants conditions: A glance at this new literature. Intercourse Family relations Ther 20. Stokes R. Frederick-Recascino C. Ladies perceived human body image interactions having personal contentment. J Women Ageing 2003;15(1):17-29. DOI:/J074v15n01_03. Zawawi JA. Relationships anywhere between Bmi, Muscles Image Dissatisfaction and Mental Worry certainly one of Fitness center Girls Profiles during the Zarqa-Jordan. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2014;4(1):11-20. Evans C, Dolan B. Physique questionnaire: Derivation of shortened “option models”. Int J Eat Disord 1993;13(3):315-21. DOI: -108X(199304)13:3 3. CO;2-step three. Keys A beneficial, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura Letter, Taylor HL.
Indicator from relative lbs and carrying excess fat. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):655-65. DOI: /ije/dyu058. Hendrick SS. A general measure of relationships pleasure. J 1988;50(1):93-8. DOI:31. AL-Otaibi HH, Naseef SL, Raouf TA. Muscles picture disappointment, pounds updates and you may physical activity certainly one of an example regarding students when you look at the Saudi Arabia. Eating Nutr Sci 2013;4(6):616-twenty-five. DOI:/fns. Seligman MEP. Positive wellness. Appl Psychol 2008;57(1):3-18. DOI: /j. Yamamiya Y, Dollars TF, Melnyk SE, Posavac, Hd, Posavac SS. Ladies connection with thin-and-breathtaking news photos: Human body visualize aftereffects of news-best internalization and you can feeling-protection interventions. Looks Image 2004;2(1):74-80. DOI:/j. Lovell GP, Gordon JA, Mueller MB, Mulgrew K, Sharman R. Satisfaction from Basic Emotional Means, Self-Determined Do so Desire, and you can Emotional Better-Being in Parents Exercise in-group-Based Rather than Individual-Established Contexts. Medical care Female Int 2016;37(5):568-82. DOI:333. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Hunter JA.
Obesity discrimination: the newest part out of physical appearance, private ideology, and you will anti-lbs bias. Int J Obes (Lond) 20. Give PG, Boersma H. And then make sense of are weight: An excellent hermeneutic investigation regarding adults’ explanations getting obesity. Couns Psychother Res 2005;5(3):212-20. DOI: 1690500310429. Choo J, Jeon S, Lee J. Intercourse differences in wellness-relevant quality of life with the intestinal being obese inside good Korean population. BMJ Open 20-003954. Bolton MA, Lobben We, Stern TA. The latest impact of muscles image for the patient worry. Prim Proper care Mate J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12(2):722-34. DOI: /PCC. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Body image and relationship fulfillment: research with the mediating part out of sexual regularity and sexual joy. J Fam Psychol 2011 http://www.datingranking.net/de/lesben-dating April 1;24(2):156-64. DOI: /a001906. Pujols Y, Close BN, Meston CM. This new association between sexual pleasure and the body photo in females.
J Gender Med 2010;7(2 Pt 2):905-sixteen. DOI:/j. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam E, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, mais aussi al. Areas, being obese, and you will all forms of diabetes–good randomized social try out. N Eng J Med 2011 October 20;365(16):1509-19. DOI: /NEJMsa1103216. Williams K. Gets the future of ination out-of gender, wedding, and you may emotional well-are. J Wellness Soc Behav 2014 Get several;44(4):470-87.